Free Online Games | Free Software Downloads 
Search

  Home    Recent Articles    Most visited    Highest rated    Forum  
Home Cancer Survival

The Learning Curve – An Analysis Of The Development Of Mr Alan Doherty's Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
May 17, 2008, 9:35 am | visits: 140 | wordcount: 632
By Dr Richard Viney

The learning curve in a production setting is a concept which was first introduced in the aeronautical industry during the 1920s. It was developed to analyze the time taken to move from the initial phase of production, where work is slower and less efficient, to a more effective phase, once production is well established. Clearly, the notion of a learning curve is relevant in surgery. When developing a new service, or introducing a new technique, there will be a phase when the surgeon only has a small amount of experience in that procedure. Understanding this learning curve is very important in order to minimize risks to patients, but at the same time, allow for the development of new services. The learning curve enables us to divide the introduction of a new procedure into the early ‘ramping up' stage and the later ‘production' phase. In the early ‘ramping up' phase, measures such as mentoring and low risk case mix should be introduced to minimize adverse outcomes for patients. Once the surgeon completes their learning curve and are in the ‘production phase' the risk to patients will be minimal. However, the learning curve has not been applied as effectively to surgery as it potentially could be. The learning curve is generally measured in terms of operating time. While this is a simple variable, which is valuable in terms of planning theater time, it is of little significance for patients in terms of clinical outcomes. Equally, it is highly subjective and can be manipulated. I set out to explore the use of additional variables in a study of the data of Mr Alan Doherty, of Birmingham Prostate Clinic and the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham. Mr Doherty is one of a small number of surgeons in the UK undertaking laparoscopic prostatectomies. I approached Mr Doherty because he has carried out a large number of these complex, specialised procedures and he has an extensive, audited database of all patients' results. My analysis was of the first 300 laparoscopic prostatectomies performed by Mr Doherty between June 2003 and June 2006. I introduced two new variables in addition to operating time. A very precise measurement of post-operative PSA was used, along with positive margins. Positive margins is the term used to describe any evidence of malignant cells at the edge of the removed prostate. This would present a risk of some tumour cells remaining in the surgical field. Both of these variables are clinically relevant and cannot be adjusted or manipulated. I used what is known as Statistical Process Control charts (SPC) to assess these variables. SPC charts are not league tables – they do not rank one surgeon against another. Instead, they set out the limits of expected standards, allowing for risk adjustment and single case variation. The analysis demonstrated that in terms of operating times, Mr Doherty moved from the ramping up stage to production stage after the 28th patient. The transition was at the 30th patient in terms of uPSA (Ultra-sensitive PSA) and 32nd for positive margins. The analysis also shows that the learning curve is not a simple two phase process, but that learning continues throughout practice. There is not one learning curve, but several, depending on which variable is being measured. Mr Doherty's data shows he was within acceptable standards during his learning curve of the first 30 cases. During the subsequent 270 cases, Mr Doherty exceeded acceptable standards. To place this study into a wider text, it demonstrates how SPC charts can be used to chart a variety of measurements of the learning curve. It offers a more rigorous model for governance, with the potential for issuing an early warning if standards fall below acceptable limits, and provides a far more meaningful assessment of clinical outcomes to inform both the patient and the surgeon. In this regard, they are useful for monitoring both the learning curve and the ongoing performance of the surgeon.

Dr Richard Viney has conducted this study on behalf of the Birmingham Prostate Clinic, UK who have a range of pioneering prostate cancer treatments, including Radical Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.
Source:www.isnare.com
Google
 
Web www.articles3000.com
E-mailE-mail  Printer friendlyPrinter  PublisherPublisher  


Rate this article: 1 2 3 4 5  

Related articles...
Breast Cancer Signs: Distinct Indicators to Facilitate Diagnosing the Disease
What Are The Risk Factors For Pancreatic Cancer?
How Does Colon Cancer Diet Help to Prevent Cancer?
The Importance of a Healthy Diet
Delayed Cancer Diagnosis – How Will it Effect You?
Cancer – An Overview
Life's Precious Moments
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy - How to Survive Radiotherapy
Herceptin Treatment - How to Survive Treatment With Herceptin
I Was Given TWO YEARS To LIFE
   Related Tags
   Bookmark Us
Set this page as your
home page

Add this page to your favorites:
   Categories
Advice
Aging
Arts and Crafts
Auto and Trucks
Break-up
Business
Business and Finances
Cancer Survival
Career
Cheating
Classifieds
Computers and The Internet
Cooking
Culture
Dating
Death
Education
Entertainment
Etiquette
Family
Finances
Food and Drink
Gadgets and Gizmos
Gardening
Health
Hobbies
Home Improvement
Humor
Internet
Jobs
Kids and Teens
Leadership
Legal Matters
Marketing
Marriage
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Online Business
Opinions
Parenting
Pets and Animals
Poetry
Politics
Real Estate
Recreation
Recreation and Sports
Relationships
Religion
Self Improvement and Motivation
Sexuality
Short Stories
Site Promotion
Society
Travel and Leisure
Web Development
Women
World Affairs
Writing
   Our Picks
Limewire
AVG Free
MSN Messenger 7.5
Download Firefox
DVD Shrink
DC++
Partition Magic
Ares Galaxy
   Partners
Download free software
Free Online Games
Miniclip
  
Powered by Apache, PHP, MySQL © 2006 Elerion, ltd.